Don't think that I've missed the irony that for the last three months we've been told that if the tax levy doesn't pass in November the city will have to cut $225,000 out of the parks budget but somehow adding the $225,000 in expenditures to run the Music Center is not only possible, the recommendation is to lock it in so no matter how bad safety services suffer we are still committed to sending money to Cincinnati even five, seven and ten years from now.
Here is the letter I wrote. I'm open to your evaluation and comments on responsibility / irresponsibility.
Lets Build Our New Firehouse the way we Promised.
Last week's letter to the editor by Mr. Franks provides a prime example of why at the end of the last city council meeting I invited those who disagree with my positions to speak up. Mr. Franks contention that I "dispersed false information to try and convince voters that the city ... was stealing money from the schools." comes at the perfect time to highlight that taking money that rightly belongs to the schools is still an option considered by city officials. This time the money would come from the Bethel School system and the excuse given by the city proponents is because they want to build a Firehouse on the north end of the city.
As always when discussing TIF districts it is important to distinguish a proper TIF such as the one created to help pay for the road and sewer improvements at the new Trimble facility from an improper TIF such as the one proposed for across the street from Trimble on Parktowne Blvd. Even though building a Firehouse is an appropriate use of TIF dollars, in this case demanding that the schools give up 70% of their property tax is wrong because the residents of the City have already passed a special levy that put $1.9 million dollars in the bank to pay for that $2.0 million facility. Once the Firehouse is built and paid for that special levy turns into operating funds that could help sustain the facility.
Years ago city officials promised that if residents passed a special levy the city would build a new Firehouse. This week I was told the Firehouse only gets built if citizens pass another levy and the city is allowed to take Bethel School money to pay for it. I think it is time for promises kept. We must start investing in the things that make a city great like schools, parks, streets, police and fire. Let's honor our commitment and begin to lay the Firehouse foundation today using the money residents already gave us for that purpose.
Below is the sensational version of the first paragraph. It would be fair for me to write it this way given the way City officials phrase their plans in order to deceive in a way that promotes the idea they are trying to sell. Even though I can write the same way, I can't actually in good faith present it as useful to someone trying to understand the issue.
In case you missed it,
Comments
Music center management
If they only schedule 6 concerts a year then how would they justify their salary? If they are a bad company, are we stuck with them for 10 years? Is there a buyout clause to get rid of them?
I'm not against the $225,000 if they do great and help make the music center a huge success. That might be a bargain price.
What would happen in years 5 thru 10 if they are doing excellent and they demand a raise? When Huber says no because you have a contract, they simply could stop scheduling as many events. Are there repercussions for that?
As Tom said, the city is in a big hurry to sign a contract but will we ever see details before hand?
Will or is the city attempting to get any other management companies to offer bids and state what they can bring to the table?
Odds are, the city manager called the first company out of the phone book and we will be stuck with them.
These are exactly the kind of comments that I hope other council members hear and think about.
Since it was already from a special levy specifically for a new fire station, who gets to change the law redirecting the money?
If I voted for money towards a specific project…and then the council changes it for whatever they want…then why would I ever believe them again? Such as the newest income tax levy coming up in November?
Does the council just not care what people think?
I'm already a "no" vote coming in November.
Why would I want to move to the newer neighborhood north if I-70 and have my kids go to Bethel, if my tax money does not go towards helping that school system?
What happens if Bethel says no to giving up 70% of the taxes? All they have to do is tell Huber to pay for the new fire station from the $1.9 million. Why wouldn't Bethel simply offer up the additional $100K and tell Huber to build the damn fire station. They would get the best of both worlds, a new station and get to keep all of their rightly due tax monies.
Response to Doug
If the city finds a different way to pay for the Firehouse then the money set aside already can be used for operations. Example if a rich person were to donate $2.2 million toward building the Firehouse then the money in the bank wouldn't be needed for building the Firehouse and the $1.9 million could be used for operations.
If Bethel schools were to take my recommendation and refuse to agree to a 70/30 split of their money then City council could take a vote and make them give up 75% of their money.