Another no bid contract.
All right, good evening this is Tom McMasters. I figure I'll talk a little bit while I'm on my drive home.
0:00:10.929,0:00:18.778
What I'm going to talk about today is the
0:00:21.460,0:00:25.350
Aquatic Center contract between the YMCA and
0:00:26.050,0:00:27.060
Huber Heights
0:00:27.060,0:00:33.000
It's what was discussed in the last work session and it looks like they're going to award it
0:00:33.250,0:00:36.360
to the YMCA at the next meeting.
0:00:37.210,0:00:44.009
There's a couple things that caught my attention to this. As you might know from
0:00:45.129,0:00:50.039
The write-up there's gonna be another no bid contract and that gets a lot of attention.
0:00:50.039,0:00:53.549
So that's one of the reasons I put it up up there.
0:00:54.129,0:00:58.319
Most of the reasons why I'm going to talk about this today is because
0:00:58.930,0:01:01.319
The council is again. Losing the opportunity
0:01:02.260,0:01:03.399
to
0:01:03.399,0:01:05.399
demonstrate
0:01:07.450,0:01:09.450
Good way to
0:01:09.530,0:01:11.830
Actually conduct business within the city.
0:01:12.470,0:01:15.909
Even if there wasn't a bid out there,
0:01:15.950,0:01:22.330
It makes good sense for them to go out and to get other people to to make an offer.
0:01:27.350,0:01:29.500
One of the points that I wanted to make
0:01:30.590,0:01:32.150
in this video
0:01:32.150,0:01:34.150
is that
0:01:34.460,0:01:36.350
we had
0:01:36.350,0:01:39.160
gone out last time and got
0:01:40.580,0:01:43.359
Dayton polls to to submit an offer
0:01:44.270,0:01:48.639
During the bidding process five years ago. With that
0:01:49.880,0:01:53.320
council should have in this debate gone and
0:01:54.140,0:01:56.140
compared
0:01:56.450,0:01:59.080
0:02:00.500,0:02:03.399
what the contract would cost the city
0:02:04.700,0:02:11.380
compared to what It did cost the city with the contract that they actually had awarded to the YMCA. All right, so we had the opportunity
0:02:12.230,0:02:13.670
to
0:02:13.670,0:02:18.369
go ahead and make that comparison and they've chosen not to.
0:02:19.670,0:02:21.670
so that's one of the points that I
0:02:21.709,0:02:26.469
Will talk to or at least have in my head and the other thing that caught my attention
0:02:27.130,0:02:34.929
during this past meeting was that the city manager talked about all the work that the city has done on
0:02:35.299,0:02:41.349
the Aquatic Center over the past year year and a half that doesn't appear to be
0:02:42.320,0:02:44.320
tracked within the
0:02:46.549,0:02:53.889
Operational budget. So that when they talk about the city spending $11,000 -
0:02:55.370,0:02:58.660
from general fund to maintain the
0:02:59.360,0:03:04.089
Aquatic Center, they're not talking about all the extra money that they've put in
0:03:05.150,0:03:08.620
by the city performing maintenance itself.
0:03:09.260,0:03:12.039
So there's a couple of things about that particular item that
0:03:12.920,0:03:17.649
I'd like to talk about because generally when I look at the
0:03:18.380,0:03:22.809
Aquatic Center and I compared it to the old pool that was on fish burg.
0:03:22.840,0:03:26.890
I've always said that the city was doing a really good
0:03:27.500,0:03:29.889
job in providing the service for
0:03:30.410,0:03:38.079
Its residents with the Aquatic Center compared to the pool. And if you just look at the difference between what those amenities were
0:03:39.230,0:03:45.880
Then you would know. Then add on to that that the city was spending
0:03:46.610,0:03:48.380
probably about
0:03:48.380,0:03:50.380
$20,000 a year in
0:03:50.630,0:03:54.999
additional funds to maintain that pool because it was in bad shape.
0:03:55.160,0:04:00.489
It had a lot of leaks and they didn't charge very much to get in. So
0:04:01.070,0:04:05.679
as residents it was costing about $20,000 in general fund money
0:04:06.530,0:04:08.530
to maintain that pool.
0:04:09.769,0:04:11.060
Whereas
0:04:11.060,0:04:13.510
when you talk in the aquatic center
0:04:14.150,0:04:15.410
0:04:15.410,0:04:16.880
It cost
0:04:16.880,0:04:19.209
$11,000 or so this past year.
0:04:20.120,0:04:22.419
You know that's less than
0:04:23.300,0:04:30.160
what it was costing to have the old pool.
And you certainly have a much nicer facility for residents to go to.
0:04:30.720,0:04:36.119
Now the cost to get into the Aquatic Center compared to the cost get a pool, is different.
0:04:36.120,0:04:42.989
You take that into consideration. Some people may not think it's a great value but in general for a taxpayer that
0:04:43.570,0:04:49.769
wouldn't use either of those things. It seems to me that it was better to have
0:04:50.350,0:04:52.210
the Aquatic Center over the pool.
0:04:52.210,0:04:54.210
Now
0:04:54.700,0:04:57.059
we've gotten into the situation where
0:04:58.090,0:05:01.950
the city is providing a lot of the maintenance for
0:05:02.590,0:05:03.730
the
0:05:03.730,0:05:05.350
Aquatic Center and
0:05:05.350,0:05:09.480
they're not going out and tracking those expenditures. They're not charging. They're not showing it on the books.
0:05:09.630,0:05:15.390
So you're not doing an apples to apples comparison again. If they've spent
0:05:16.090,0:05:20.340
twenty thousand dollars in man-hours or twenty thousand dollars in
0:05:22.210,0:05:24.210
equipment.
0:05:24.220,0:05:28.049
Actually equipment probably would get tracked one way or another.
0:05:29.380,0:05:31.890
It might be hard to find,
0:05:33.220,0:05:35.369
but if they went out and bought paint
0:05:36.040,0:05:42.059
somewhere that paint should be shown in the city budget as a pool expense. but
0:05:43.050,0:05:46.020
if they put a man hours into the aquatic center, and they have
0:05:46.660,0:05:48.660
$20,000 man-hours it
0:05:49.919,0:05:53.359
may not be very easy to find.
0:05:53.360,0:05:58.369
So you don't know how the comparison goes anymore. So I
0:05:59.999,0:06:04.428
was kind of disappointed that your council members did not
0:06:05.909,0:06:13.308
tell the city manager that it was required that as part of the evaluation of the Aquatic Center.
0:06:13.830,0:06:17.089
He has to do a better job with reporting the
0:06:18.119,0:06:23.029
cash that's being spent on some of these other things outside of
0:06:23.729,0:06:25.729
the
0:06:26.949,0:06:33.538
YMCA. So that's one of the things that I talked about. The other things that I
0:06:34.449,0:06:40.379
talked about is process. Why you go through a bidding process or at least
0:06:41.349,0:06:43.349
0:06:43.910,0:06:51.010
ask other companies to tell you how much it would cost to run the facilities. Alright so last time.
0:06:52.490,0:06:59.829
One of the trepidations I have with that system right there, is last time, I was able to get Dayton pool to offer a bid
0:06:59.930,0:07:01.430
and
0:07:01.430,0:07:03.110
unfortunately,
0:07:03.110,0:07:05.889
our city manager was upset that
0:07:06.830,0:07:09.940
he had to evaluate two different bids.
0:07:10.910,0:07:13.239
Where we had a pretty good relationship with
0:07:14.300,0:07:16.300
Dayton pool,
0:07:17.810,0:07:22.570
after that not so much and so we lost some of the services that that company provided,
0:07:23.389,0:07:30.429
simply because they chose to participate and offering a bid. But the main point that I wanted to talk about is
0:07:31.430,0:07:33.430
council and their
0:07:33.680,0:07:37.389
loss of an opportunity to be able to judge whether
0:07:38.030,0:07:40.720
they're making good decisions or not.
0:07:41.510,0:07:47.169
Five years ago, we had Dayton Pool put in a proposal and we had the YMCA put in a proposal.
0:07:48.020,0:07:52.660
The Dayton pool proposal was a firm fixed price.
0:07:52.669,0:08:00.669
So, you know how much they were going to charge you each year for the services that they were going to provide. You didn't know
0:08:01.220,0:08:04.299
how much the YMCA was going to provide because
0:08:05.900,0:08:08.769
the way that they did it is, if they used more
0:08:09.680,0:08:13.120
Chlorine, they would charge more money. Whereas the Dayton
0:08:14.090,0:08:19.299
pool told you up front what it was going to charge.
0:08:20.550,0:08:22.550
Because we picked
0:08:22.710,0:08:25.969
The YMCA, you can go back and compare
0:08:26.820,0:08:33.530
what would it cost to have Dayton pool to what it actually did cost for the YMCA.
0:08:34.740,0:08:38.000
You didn't have a single member of council go to
0:08:38.790,0:08:41.929
your city manager and say, "hey
0:08:41.930,0:08:45.980
how do those compare? Did we do better by picking the YMCA
0:08:45.980,0:08:50.779
then we would have with Dayton pool or not." That just seems to be
0:08:51.750,0:08:53.640
kind of a foul
0:08:53.640,0:08:58.910
as far as I'm concerned, if they are not going to go back there and do that comparison and
0:08:59.640,0:09:00.930
again.
0:09:00.930,0:09:05.090
They have chosen to do a no-bid contract to the YMCA this time.
0:09:05.160,0:09:09.499
So you don't know five years from now when they go ahead and
0:09:12.030,0:09:17.899
do a re-compete, how the city is doing compared to what it would have done.
0:09:19.950,0:09:25.489
What the other providers could have provided in that term. So I
0:09:29.520,0:09:34.970
again call foul with the way the council has decided that it's going to proceed
0:09:36.519,0:09:38.519
awarding the contracts.
0:09:39.759,0:09:45.719
So I guess that generally sums up where I was going with this video and
0:09:47.829,0:09:49.829
Thank you for your attention.
0:09:50.980,0:09:55.740
Yes, ask from your council, thanks a lot.
Here is the Council discussion from the Dec 3, 2019 work session.